The Lithuanian “buvo + be-present active participle” construction revisited: A corpus-based study

Peter M. Arkadiev

doi:10.32798/bl.361

Published: 2019-12-31

Vol. 10 (2019)

The Lithuanian “buvo + be-present active participle” construction revisited

Peter M. Arkadiev

Baltic Linguistics

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.361

A corpus-based study

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a large-scale corpus-based investigation of the Lithuanian construction involving a past-tense auxiliary būti ‘be’ and a present active participle, which in previous literature has been identified as avertive, i.e. expressing a past event that was imminent but did not occur. It is shown that although the avertive uses account for about three quarters of the occurrences of the construction, it has a robust share of progressive and proximative uses, and that, moreover, the counterfactuality meaning of the avertive is often provided by the context rather than directly encoded by the construction. The lexical and grammatical profiles of the different functions of the construction are investigated in detail, showing how lexical meaning and actionality interact with the semantics of the construction and with the context.

Keywords:

Lithuanian, aspect, actionality, avertive, proximative, progressive

Similar Articles

Axel Holvoet, Phasal and proximative complementation: Lithuanian baigti , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 5 (2014)
Axel Holvoet, Anna Daugavet, Vaiva Žeimantienė, The Perfective present in Lithuanian , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 12 No. 12 (2021): Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours
Axel Holvoet, Gina Kavaliūnaitė, The Lithuanian mirative present and its history , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 12 No. 12 (2021): Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours
Danguolė Kotryna Kapkan, Perfect in Lithuanian: A case study based on data from Facebook comments , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 12 No. 12 (2021): Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours
Daniel Petit, New insights on Lithuanian accentuation from the unpublished manuscripts of Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913) , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 1 (2010)
Vladimir Panov, Untangling the functions of aspectual distinctions in the Lithuanian imperative against the background of Slavonic. , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 12 No. 12 (2021): Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours
Peter Arkadiev, From transitivity to aspect: the causative-inchoative alternation and its extensions in Lithuanian , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 4 (2013)
Ineta Dabašinskienė, The acquisition of compounds in Lithuanian , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 1 (2010)
Ilja A. Seržant, Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 4 (2013)
Anna Daugavet, [review of:] Cynthia Vakareliyska. 2015. Lithuanian Root List , Baltic Linguistics: Vol. 7 (2016)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Arkadiev, P. M. (2019). The Lithuanian “buvo + be-present active participle” construction revisited: A corpus-based study. Baltic Linguistics, 10, 65–108. https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.361

Cited by / Share

References

Alexandrova, Anna. 2016. Avertive constructions in Europe and North Asia. An areal typolo-gy. Presentation from Chronos 12, Caen, June 2016.
Google Scholar

Alexandrova, Anna. 2019. Avertives & Co: Towards a typology of ‘almost’ in the verbal do-main. Presentation from the 13th Biennial meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Pavia, September 2019/
Google Scholar

Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskiх jazykov [Comparative Syntax of Participles in Baltic Languages]. Vilnius: Mokslas.
Google Scholar

Arkadiev, Peter. 2011a. On the aspectual uses of the prefix be- in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguis-tics 2, 37-78.
Google Scholar

Arkadiev, Peter. 2011b. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In: Daniel Petit, Claire Le Feuvre, Henri Menantaud, eds., Langues baltiques, langues slaves. Paris: Éditions CNRS, 57-86.
Google Scholar

Arkadiev, Peter. 2012. Aspektual’naja sistema litovskogo jazyka (s privlečeniem areal’nyx dannyx) [The aspectual system of Lithuanian (with some areal data)]. In Vladimir A. Plungjan (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki, vyp. 6: Tipologija aspektual’nyx sistem i kategorij [Studies in the theory of grammar. Vol. 6. Typology of aspectual systems and categories]. (= Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 8:2), 45-121.
Google Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Karen Ebert & Casper de Groot. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In: Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 516-558.
Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. Pirahã. In: Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum, eds., Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. 1. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 200-325.
Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types, and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York: Gar-land.
Google Scholar

Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Grimm, Nadine. 2015. A Grammar of Gyeli. PhD Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1998. Hua (Papuan). In: Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky, eds., The Hand-book of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 539-562.
Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1994. On the genesis of aspect in African languages: The proximative. Pro-ceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society: Special Ses-sion on Historical Issues in African Linguistics, 35-46.
Google Scholar

Holvoet, Axel. 2014. Phasal and proximative complementation: Lithuanian baigti. Baltic Linguistics 5, 81-122.
Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27-188.
Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania. 1998. On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted. Studies in Language 22.1, 113-160.
Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation. An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania. 2009. Grammatical categories and linguistic theory: Elaborateness in gram-mar. In: Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells, eds., Proceeding of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2. London: SOAS, 13-28.
Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova & Anvita Abbi. 2015. The grammar of “counter-to-fact”. Presentation at the conference Diversity Linguistics: Retrospect and Pro-spect, Leipzig, May 2015.
Google Scholar

Maslov, Jurij S. 1981. Grammatika bolgarskogo jazyka [A grammar of Bulgarian]. Moscow: Vysšaja škola.
Google Scholar

Platicyna, Olga. 2014. Grammatičeskie profili litovskix glagolov: predvaritel’noe statis-tičeskoe issledovanie na materiale častotnogo slovarja. [Grammatical profiles of Lithuanian verbs: A preliminary quantitative investigation on the basis of a frequen-cy dictionary.] Term paper, Chair of General linguistics, Saint-Petersburg State Uni-versity.
Google Scholar

Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. Antirezul’tativ: do i posle rezul’tata. In: Vladimir A. Plungian (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 1. Glagol’nye kategorii [Studies in the Theory of Grammar. Vol. 1. Verbal categories]. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 50-88.
Google Scholar

Sližienė, Nijolė. 1961. Apie sudurtines pradėtines veiksmažodžių formas [About the peri-phrastic inceptive verbal forms]. Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 4, 42-64.
Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticali-zation revisited. In: Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. I. Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Am-sterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 189-218.
Google Scholar

Utka, Andrius. 2009. Dažninis rašytinės lietuvių kalbos žodynas 1 milijono žodžių morfolo-giškai anotuoto tekstyno pagrindu. [A frequency dictionary of written Lithuanian based on an annotated -million-word corpus.] Kaunas: VDU.
Google Scholar

Vafaeian, Ghazaleh. 2018. Progressives in Use and Contact. A Descriptive, Areal and Typo-logical Study with Special Focus on Selected Iranian Languages. PhD Dissertation, Stockholm University.
Google Scholar

Ziegeler, Debra. 2000. What almost can reveal about counterfactual inferences. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1743-1776.
Google Scholar