The Latvian continuative construction runāt vienā runāšanā ‘talk in one talking’ = ‘keep talking’
Abstract
Latvian may express continuative aspect by means of a complex construction which consists of a verb and a locative phrase headed by an action noun from the same verb. The construction is productive and attested with a variety of durative verbs. Salient exemplars are some verbs of talking and crying. In a clause the construction most often is treated in the same way as simple verb forms. Formally and functionally the construction is related to three other cognate constructions in Latvian as well as to iteration of the type talk and talk. However, in these other constructions continuative meaning arises only as an implicature or contains more specific nuances. It is proposed that cognate constructions may form a link between morphological reduplication and syntactic iteration.
Keywords
continuative aspect; cognate construction; figura etymologica; iteration; reduplication; action noun
References
Alhawary, Mohammad T. 2011. Modern Standard Arabic Grammar: A Learner’s Guide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bielenstein, August. 1863. Handbuch der lettischen Sprache. I. Grammatik. Mitau: Fr. Lucas’ Buchhandlung.
Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In: Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49-69.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Endzelin, J[ānis]. 1923. Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.
Endzelin, J[ānis] & K[ārlis] Mühlenbach. 1907. Latweeschu gramatika, J. Endselina un K. Mühlenbacha sarakstita [Latvian grammar, compiled by J. Endselin and K. Mühlenbach]. Riga.
Erelt, Mati. 1997. Reduplication in Estonian. In: Mati Erelt, ed., Estonian: Typological Studies. II. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool, 9-41.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Eric Johnston. 2011. A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gil, David. 2005. From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In: Bernhard Hurch, ed., Studies on Reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 31-64.
Glad, Hanna. 2016. Keep V-ing: Aspectuality and Event Structure. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
Heinämai, Orvokki. 1995. The progressive in Finnish: Pragmatic constraints. In: Pier Marco Bertinetto et al., eds.,
Temporal Reference, Aspect, and Actionality, Vol. : Typological Perspectives. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier, 143-154.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holvoet, Axel. 2004. Eine modale Konstruktion ostseefinnischer Herkunft im Lettischen. In: Irma Hyvärinen et al., eds., Etymologie, Entlehnungen und Entwicklungen. Festschrift für J. Koivulehto zum 70. Geburtstag. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 117-127.
Hurch, Bernhard, Motomi Kajitani, Veronika Mattes, Ursula Stangel & Ralf Vollmann. 2008. Other Reduplication Phenomena. Graz Reduplication Project.
Kajitani, Motomi. 2010. Semantic properties of reduplication among the world’s languages. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 5: Proceedings of WIGL 2005, 93-106.
Kalnača, Andra & Ilze Lokmane. 2010. Defective paradigms of reflexive nouns and participles in Latvian. Proceedings of the British Academy 163, 53-67.
Kari, Ethelbert Emmanuel. 2017. Cognate object constructions in Degema. LLA Linguistique et Langues Africaines, # 3, 2017, 29-53.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. Social action of syntactic reduplication. Journal of Pragmatics 42.3, 800-824.
Kim, Jong-Bok & Jooyoung Lim. 2012. English cognate object construction: a usage-based Construction Grammar approach. Paper presented at the Arizona Linguistics Circle 6, Arizona State University, October 5-7.
Köller, Wilhelm. 2007. Stil und Grammatik. In: Ulla Fix et al., eds., Rhetorik und Stilistik: ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, 2. Halbband. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1210-1230.
Latviešu Valodas Gramatika [Latvian grammar]. 2013. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.
Maas, Utz. 2007. Syntaktische Reduplikation: stilistische Ressource vs. grammatische Form. Sprachbaudifferenzen in semitischen und indoeuropäischen Sprachen. In: Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze, eds., Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation. Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 1–28.
Mair, Christian. 2012. Progressive and continuous aspect. In: Robert I. Binnick, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press.
Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0028.
Mattiola, Simone. 2019. Typology of Pluractional Constructions in the Languages of the World. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Mattiola, Simone. 2017. The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio 16, 119-146.
Melloni, Chiara & Francesca Masini. 2017. Cognate constructions in Italian and beyond. In: Lars Hellan et al., eds. Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 220–250.
Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika. I. Fonētika un morfoloģija [Grammar of Modern Literary Latvian I. Phonetics and morphology], ed. E. Sokols. 1959. Rīga: LPSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.
Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika. II Sintakse [Grammar of Modern Literary Latvian II. Syntax], ed. E. Sokols . 1962. Rīga: LPSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In: Joseph H. Greenberg, ed., Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 297-334.
Müller, Ana & Luciana Sanchez-Mendes. Forthcoming. Pluractionality: the phenomena, the issues and a case study. To appear in L. Matthewson, C. Méier, H. Rullmann, T.E. Zimmermann, eds., Companion to Semantics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nau, Nicole. 2015. Word formation, syntax, and register: Latvian action nouns in -šana. In: Artūras Judžentis & Stephan Kessler, eds., Contributions to Morphology and Syntax. Proceedings of the 4th Greifswald University Conference on Baltic Languages. Berlin: Logos Verlag, 149–178.
Nau, Nicole. 2016. Argument realization in Latvian action nominal constructions. A corpus and text based investigation. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds. Argument Realization in Baltic. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 461-521.
Nau, Nicole & Axel Holvoet. 2015. Voice in Baltic – an overview. In: Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds. Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-36.
Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina. 2006. Metonymy in locatives of state. In: Lyle Campbell & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, eds., Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, Space and Person in Finnish. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 67-100.
Ozols, Arturs. 1961. Latviešu tautasdziesmu valoda [The language of Latvian folk songs]. Riga: Latvijas Valsts izdeviecība.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 1999. Cognate objects in Russian: Is the notion ‘cognate’ relevant for syntax? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 44, 267-291.
Pilvik, Maarja-Liisa. 2017. Deverbal -mine action nominals in the Estonian dialect corpus. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 8.2, 295-326.
Range, Jochen D. 1976. Sprachlich-stilistische Untersuchung zur „Figura etymologica“ in den litauischen Dainos. Baltistica 12.2, 176-187.
Range, Jochen D. 1977. Sprachlich-stilistische Untersuchung zur „Figura etymologica“ in den litauischen Dainos (Fortsetzung). Baltistica 13.1, 281-296.
Rubino, Carl. 2012. Reduplication. In: Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds.,
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/27, Accessed on 2019-04-21.)
Sailer, Manfred. 2010. The family of English cognate object constructions. In: Stefan Müller, ed., Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 191-211.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Helmut Küchenhoff. 2013. Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Linguistics 24.3, 531-577.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2007. Wortwiederholungen im Englischen und Deutschen: eine korpuslinguistische Annäherung. In: Andreas Ammann & Aina Urdze, eds., Wiederholung, Parallelismus, Reduplikation: Strategien der multiplen Strukturanwendung. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 29-45.
Stolz, Thomas. 2006. (Wort-)Iteration: (k)eine universelle Konstruktion. In Kerstin Fischer & Anatol Stefanowitsch, eds, Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 105-132.
Stolz, Thomas & Nataliya Levkovych. 2018. Function vs. form: on ways of telling repetition and reduplication apart. In: Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald, eds., Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 29-66.
Sulkala, Helena & Merja Karjalainen. 1992. Finnish. (Descriptive Grammars). London, New York: Routledge.
Tommola, Hannu. 2000. Progressive aspect in Baltic Finnic. In: Östen Dahl, ed., Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 655-692.
Wälchli, Bernhard. 1996. Letto-livisches und Livo-lettisches. Eine Studie zur Bedeutungskonvergenz im nordosteuropäischen Kontaktraum. Lizenziatsarbeit, Universität Bern.
Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yasin, Ayman. 2014. Cognate accusatives: lost in translation. European Scientific Journal 10, 327–353.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Department of Scandinavian Studies, al. Niepodległości 4, PL-61-874 Poznań Poland
http://naunicol-e.home.amu.edu.pl/
