Appel, R., Muysken, P. (2006). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9053568573
Google Scholar
Baker, C., Wright W., E. (2017). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_2
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Bradac, J. J. (1990). Language attitudes and impression formation. W: Giles, H., Robinson, W. P. (red.), Handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 387–412.
Google Scholar
Budarjowa, L. (red.) (2018). 20 lět Witaj, Bautzen: Serbske šulske towarstwo z.t. (https://www.sorbischer-schulverein.de/_download/sst_jubil__um_inhalt_f__r_Internet.pdf [5 VII 2021].
Google Scholar
Dołowy-Rybińska, N. (w druku). Native and non-native speakers school language practices and transmission in Upper Lusatia. W: Hornsby, M., McLeod, W. (red.), Transmitting minority languages: Complementary reversing language shift strategies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Dołowy-Rybińska, N., Ratajczak, C. (2019a). Upper Sorbian language education: When community language maintenance practices disregard top-down revitalisation strategies, Language, Culture and Curriculum.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1630424
Google Scholar
Dołowy-Rybińska, N., Ratajczak, C. (2019b). Languages and cultures in contact: The place of new speakers in the education system in Upper Lusatia, Cognitive Studies / Études cognitives 19, 1–17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1901
Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching 31 (3), 117–135.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X
Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. W: Dörnyei, Z., Ushioda, E. (red.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 9–42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.30945943.5
Google Scholar
Doyé, P. (2004). A Methodological Framework for the Teaching of Intercomprehension, Language Learning Journal 30 (1), 59–68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730485200241
Google Scholar
Eriksen, T. H. (2010). Ethnicity and nationalism. Anthropological perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183h0h1
Google Scholar
European Commission. (2012). Translation and Multilingualism: Intercomprehension. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Google Scholar
García, O., Wei, Li. (2014). Translanguaging. Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_4
Google Scholar
Giles, H., Hewstone, M, Ryan, E. B., Johnson. P. (1987). Research on language attitudes. W: Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheler, K. J. (red.), Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 585–597.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858020-076
Google Scholar
Giles, H., Niedzielski, N. (1998). Italian is beautiful, German is ugly. W: Bauer, L., Trudgill, P. (red.), Language myths. London: Penguin, 85–93.
Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. (2006). Linguistic and extra-linguistic predictors of Inter-Scandinavian communication. W: van de Weijer, J., Los, B. (red.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101–113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.23.12goo
Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. (2007). The contribution of linguistic factors to the intelligibility of closely related languages, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28 (6), 445–467.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd511.0
Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. (2013). Experimental methods for measuring intelligibility of closely related language varieties. W: Balyey, R., Cameron, R., Lucas, C. (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0010
Google Scholar
Kaulfürstowa, J. (2017). Im Zentrum für die sorbische Sprache. Das WITAJ-Sprachzentrum – die Fachabteilung der Domowina. Bautzen: Domowina – Bund Lausitzer Sorben e.V. https://www.witaj-sprachzentrum.de/obersorbisch/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/WITAJ_Imagebr_DEUTSCH_web.pdf [5 VII 2021].
Google Scholar
Kaulfürstowa, J. (2020). Witaj – ein Geschenk für Ihr Kind. Bautzen: DOMOWINA – Bund Lausitzer Sorben e. V. https://www.witaj-sprachzentrum.de/obersorbisch/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/03/2020_WITAJ-Kopie-web.pdf [5 VII 2021].
Google Scholar
Keller, I, Schulz, J. (2019). Sorbisch. W: Fäcke, Ch., Meißner, F.-J. (red.), Handbuch Mehrsprachigkeits- und Mehrkulturalitätsdidaktik. Tübingen: Narr, 554–556.
Google Scholar
Kimura, G. C. (2015). Spracherhalt als Prozess. Elemente des kirchlichen Sprachmanagements bei den katholischen Sorben. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 232, 13–32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0040
Google Scholar
Ladegaard, H. J. (1998). National stereotypes and language attitudes. The perception of British, American and Australian language and culture in Denmark. Language & Communication 18, 251–274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00008-1
Google Scholar
Meissner, F-J., Capucho, F., Degache, C., Martins, A., Spita, D., Trost, M. (2011). Intercomprehension Learning, teaching, research apprentissage, enseignement, recherche. Tübingen: Narr.
Google Scholar
Melo-Pfeifer, J. (2015). An interactional perspective on intercomprehension between Romance Languages: translanguaging in multilingual chat rooms. FLuL 44 (2), 100–113.
Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B., Ramallo, F., Pujolar, J. (2015). New speakers of minority languages: the challenging opportunity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231, 1–20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0029
Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1994). Language in Society. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
SBI = Sächsischen Bildungsinstitut (2017). 2 plus – Unterricht nach dem schulartübergreifenden Konzept zweisprachige sorbischen Siedlungsgebiet des Freistaates Sachsen.
Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K., Kroskrity, P. (1998). Language ideologies. Practice and theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195105612.001.0001
Google Scholar
Sloboda, M., Brankačkec, K. (2014). The mutual intelligibility of Slavic languages as a source of support for the revival of the Sorbian language. W: Fesenmeier, L., Heinemann, S., Vicario, F. (red.), Sprachminderheiten: gestern, heute, morgen / Minoranze linguistiche: ieri, oggi, domani. Berlin: Peter Lang, 25–44.
Google Scholar
SMK = Sächsisches Staatministerium für Kultus (2004). Lehrplan Gymnasium – Sorbisch.
Google Scholar
Šołćina, J., Mehlhorn, G. (2018). Slawiniada – nowa forma rěče přesahowaceho wuknjenja, Serbska Šula 2, 47–50.
Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Wolff, H. (1959). Intelligibility and inter-ethnic attitudes. Anthropological Linguistics 1, 34–41.
Google Scholar