Blomberg, J. (2017). Non-actual motion in language and experience. In: I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), Motion and space across languages. Theory and applications (205–227). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Bogardus, E.S. (1933). A social distance scale, Sociology and Social Research, 17, 265–271.
Google Scholar

Boot, I., Pecher, D. (2010). Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63/5, 942–954.
Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. (2008). Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?, Memory and Cognition, 36/6, 1047–1056. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047
Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In: M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee, E. Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and syntactic constructions and the construction of meaning (3–15). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Coëgnarts, M., Kravanja, P. (2012). Embodied visual meaning: Image schemas in film. Projections, 6/2, 84–101. DOI: 10.3167/proj.2012.060206
Google Scholar

Dancygier, B., Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Image-schematic scaffolding in textual and visual artefacts, Journal of Pragmatics, 122, 91–106.
Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, E. (1997). Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Evans, V., Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Forceville, Ch. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In: G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Forceville, Ch. (2014). Relevance theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal communication. In: D. Machin (ed.), Visual communication (51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Forceville, Ch. (2016). The force and balance schemas in journey metaphor animations. In: C. Fernandes (ed.), Multimodality and performance (8–22). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Google Scholar

Górska, E. (2014a). The up/down orientation in language and music. In: M. Brenzinger, I. Kraska-Szlenk (eds.), The body in language. Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment (177–195). Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Górska, E. (2014b). Dynamiczne podejście do metafory, Prace Filologiczne, 64/2, 109–122.
Google Scholar

Górska, E. (2017). The path schema in verbo-pictorial aphorisms on life. In: P. Łozowski, A. Głaz (eds.), Route 66: From deep structures to surface meanings. A festschrift for Henryk Kardela on his 66th birthday (219–235). Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.
Google Scholar

Górska, E. (2019). Spatialization of abstract concepts in cartoons. A case study of verbo-pictorial image-schematic metaphors. In: I. Navarro i Ferrando (ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (279–294). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI:10.1515/9783110629460-013
Google Scholar

Górska, E. (2020). Understanding abstract concepts across modes in multimodal discourse. A cognitive linguistic approach. London/New York: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9780429282737
Google Scholar

Grady, J.E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Google Scholar

Hampe, B. (2005a). Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In: B. Hampe (ed.) (2005b), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (1–12). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Hampe, B. (ed.) (2005b). From perception to meaning. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Hendricks, R.K., Demjén, Z., Semino, E., Boroditsky, L. (2018). Emotional implications of metaphor: Consequences of metaphor framing for mindset about cancer, Metaphor and Symbol, 33/4, 267–279. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2018.1549835
Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of imagination, reason, and meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body. Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Kimmel, M. (2009). Analyzing image schemas in literature, Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 159–188.
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (1986). Abstract motion, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 12, 455–471.
Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (1993). Reference-point constructions, Cognitive Linguistics, 4/1, 1–38.
Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Lee S., Schwarz, N. (2014). Framing love: When it hurts to think we were made for each other, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 61–67. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.007
Google Scholar

Matlock, T. (2006). Depicting fictive motion in drawings. In: J. Luchjenbroers (ed.), Cognitive linguistics investigations. Across languages, fields and philosophical boundaries (67–85). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract, Language and Cognition, 2/2, 243–260.
Google Scholar

Matlock, T. (2017). Metaphor, simulation, and fictive motion. In: B. Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (477–489). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs, Cognitive Linguistics, 7/2, 183–226
Google Scholar

Matthews, J.L., Matlock, T. (2011). Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance, Social Psychology, 42/3, 185–192. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000062
Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In: V. Evans, P. Chilton (eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (351–385). London: Equinox.
Google Scholar

Radden, G., Matthis, E. (2002). Why similar to and different from?. In: H. Cuyckens, G. Radden (eds.), Perspectives on prepositions (233–255). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Google Scholar

Rybarczyk, M. (2015). Demonstratives and possessives with attitude. An intersubjectively-oriented empirical study. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’, In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, M. Garrett (eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P.H., Matlock, T., Flusberg, S.J. (2019). The role of metaphor in communication and thought, Language and Linguistics Compass, 13, 1–18. DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12327
Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. (1987). Metaphorical models of thought and speech: A comparison of historical directions and metaphorical mappings in the two domains, Proceedings of Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 13, 446–459.
Google Scholar

Williams, L.E., Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation, Psychological Science, 19/3, 302–308. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x.
Google Scholar

Winter, B., Matlock, T. (2013). Reasoning about similarity and proximity, Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 1–14.
Google Scholar

Winter, B., Matlock, T. (2017). Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. In: B. Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, embodied cognition, and discourse (99–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Wiseman, R. (2014). Social distance in hunter-gather settlement sites: A conceptual metaphor in material culture, Metaphor and Symbol, 29/2, 129-143. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2014.890469
Google Scholar

Wiseman, R. (2016). Social distance in settled communities. The conceptual metaphor, social distance is physical distance, in action, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23,1023-1052. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-015-9256-9
Google Scholar

Data sources
Google Scholar

Kapusta, J. (2014). Plus-minus. Podręcznik do myślenia. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
Google Scholar

med – Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners (First edition) 2002, Oxford: Macmillan.
Google Scholar