Arystoteles, (1988). O Duszy. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Barcelona, A. (2000). On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor. W: A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (31–58). Berlin–New York: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Bear, M. et al. (2007). Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Google Scholar

Biggs, S. et al. (2015). Sorting the Senses. W: D. Stokes et al. (ed.), Perception and its Modalities (1–9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Birbaumer, N., Schmidt, R. (2006). Biologische Psychologie. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Google Scholar

Brzezicka, B. (2016). Językowy obraz ciała – jakie schematy wyobrażeniowe można znaleźć w etymologii? W: A. Krzyżanowska et al. (ed.), Badania diachroniczne w Polsce II: między współczesnością a przeszłością (27–38). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar

Busse, D. (2012). Frame-Semantik. Ein Kompendium. Berlin: de Gruyter. Casati, R. et al. (2015). Distinguishing the Commonsense Senses. W: D. Stokes et al. (ed.), Perception and its Modalities (462–479). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Fillmore, Ch. (1985). Frames and the Semantics of Understanding, Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
Google Scholar

Fillmore, Ch. (2006). Frame Semantics. W: K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (613–620). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Google Scholar

Fish, W. (2010). Philosophy of Perception. A Contemporary Introduction. New York–London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Fix, U. (2008). Texte und Textsorten – sprachliche, kommunikative und kulturelle Phänomene. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Google Scholar

Fulkerson, M. (2015). What Counts as Touch? W: D. Stokes et al. (ed.), Perception and its Modalities (191–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Frydrysiak, S. (2017). Taniec w sprzężeniu nauk i technologii. Nowe perspektywy w badaniach tańca. Łódź–Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Przypis, Instytut Muzyki i Tańca.
Google Scholar

Golomer, E., Dupui, P. (2000). Spectral analysis of adult dancers’ sways: sex andinteraction vision-proprioception. International Journal of Neuroscience, 105(1–4), 15–26.
Google Scholar

Graziano, M., Botvinick, M. (2002). How the Brain Represents the Body: Insights from Neurophysiology and Psychology (136–157). W: W. Prinz et al. (ed.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Grice, P. (1989 [1962]). Some Remarks about the Senses. W: P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words (248–268). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Hampe, B. (ed.). (2005). From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin–New York: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Janich, N. (2008). Intertextualität und Text(sorten)vernetzung. W: N. Janich (ed.), Textlinguistik. 15 Einführungen. (177–196). Tübingen: Narr Studienbücher.
Google Scholar

Johansen, T.K. (1998). Aristotle on Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago–London: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Jokiel, M., Romanowski, L. (2014). Człowiek w przestrzeni: historia propriocepcji, Acta Medicorum Polonorum, 4, 100–108.
Google Scholar

Jola, C. et al. (2011). Prioprioceptive Integration and Body Representation: Insights into Dancers’ Expertise, Experimental Brain Research, 213, 2–3.
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2011). Język, umysł, kultura. Praktyczne wprowadzenie. Kraków: Universitas.
Google Scholar

Lackner, J. (2010a). Kinesthesia. W: B.E. Goldstein (ed.), Encyclopedia of Perception (513–517). Los Angeles–London–New Delhi–Singapore–Washington DC: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Lackner, J. (2010b). Propioception. W: B.E. Goldstein (ed.), Encyclopedia of Perception (832–836). Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2010). Metafory w naszym życiu. Przeł. T.P. Krzeszowski. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Google Scholar

Maas, V.F. (1998). Uczenie się przez zmysły. Wprowadzenie do teorii integracji sensorycznej. Warszawa: WSiP
Google Scholar

Macpherson, F. (2011). Individuating the Senses. W: F. Macpherson (ed.), The Senses. Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives (3–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Maćkiewicz, J. (2006). Językowy obraz ciała. Szkice do tematu. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Google Scholar

Matthen, M. (2015). The Individuation of the Senses. M. Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception (567–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Matthen, M. (ed.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Pędzisz, J., Staniewski, P. (2018). Körper in Bewegung: Zur Figurativität der Sprache zeitgenössischer Tänzer aus kognitiver Perspektive (159–173). W: I. Bartoszewicz et al. (ed.), Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław. Wrocław–Dresden: ATUT/Neisse Verlag.
Google Scholar

Picciuto, V., Carruthers, P. (2015). Inner Sense. W: D. Stokes et al. (ed.), Perception and its Modalities (277–294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Ritchie, B.J., Carruthers, P. (2015). The Bodily Senses. W: M. Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception (353–370). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Shabbott, B.A., Sainburg, R.L. (2010). Learning a visuomotor rotation: simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is a crucial for visuomotor remapping, Experimental Brain Research 203(1), 75–87. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2209-3.
Google Scholar

Shen, Y. (1997). Cognitive Constraints on Poetic Figures, Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 33–71.
Google Scholar

Shen, Y., Aisenman, R. (2008). ‘Heard Melodies are Sweet, but those Unheard Are Sweeter’: Synaesthetic Metaphors and Cognition, Language and Literature, 17, 107–121.
Google Scholar

Shen, Y., Gadir, O. (2009). How to Interpret the Music of Caressing: Target and Source Assignment in Synaesthetic Genitive Constructions, Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 357–371.
Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1971). Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses, The Philosophical Review, 80, 55–79.
Google Scholar

Spence, Ch. et al. (2015). Confusing Tastes with Flavours. W: D. Stokes et al. (ed.), Perception and its Modalities (247–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Spitzmüller, J., Warnke, I.H. (2011). Diskurslinguistik. Eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Stryła, W., Pogorzała, A.M. (2014). Ćwiczenia propriocepcji w rehabilitacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL.
Google Scholar

Synnott, A. (1993). The Body Social. Symbolism, Self and Society. London–New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2000). Senses, Perception and Metaphors (of Object and Objectification). W: S. Puppel et al. (ed.), Multibus vocibus de lingua (143–153). Poznań: Dziekan Wydziału Neofilologii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Google Scholar

Szwedek, A. (2011). The Ultimate Source Domain, Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 341–366.
Google Scholar

Winter, B. (2016). Taste and Smell Words Form an Affectively Loaded Part of the English Lexicon, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 975–988.
Google Scholar

Winter, B. (2019). Synaesthetic Metaphors Are Neither Synaesthetic Nor Metaphorical. W: L. Speed et al. (ed.), Perception Metaphors (105–126). Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar